Automatic detection of the foveal center in optical coherence tomography

B. Liefers, F. Venhuizen, V. Schreur, B. van Ginneken, C. Hoyng, T. Theelen and C. Sánchez

Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (2017)


Purpose : To aautomatically detect the foveal center in optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans in order to obtain an accurate and reliable reference for the assessment of various structural biomarkers, even in the presence of large abnormalities and across different scanning protocols.

Methods : 1784 OCT scans were used for the development of the proposed automatic method: 1744 scans from the European Genetic Database (EUGENDA) acquired with a Heidelberg Spectralis HRA+OCT 1 scanner and 40 scans from a publicly available dataset [1] acquired with a Bioptigen scanner. Two independent sets, with different levels of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were drawn from the same databases for evaluation: 100 scans from EUGENDA (Set A, 25 control patients and 25 for each of the AMD severity levels early, intermediate and advanced) and 100 scans from [1] (Set B, 50 control, 50 AMD).

A fully convolutional neural network based on stacked layers of dilated convolutions was trained to classify each pixel in a B-scan by assigning a probability of belonging to the fovea. The network was applied to every B-scan in the OCT volume, and the final foveal center was defined as the pixel with maximum assigned probability. An initial network was trained on the 1744 training scans from EUGENDA and optimized with the 40 training scans acquired with the Bioptigen scanner, to specialize for different levels of noise and contrast.

For all scans manual annotations were available as reference for evaluation. The foveal center was considered correctly identified if the distance between the prediction and the reference was less than the foveal radius, i.e. 750 mm.

Results : The foveal center was correctly detected in 95 OCT scans in Set A (24 control, 24 early, 25 intermediate, 22 advanced). The mean distance error was 63.7 mm with 81 detections inside a radius of 175 mm (the foveola) and 70 inside a radius of 75 mm (the umbo). In Set B, the foveal center was correctly identified in 96 OCT scans (49 control, 47 AMD). The mean distance error was 88.6 mm with 82 detections inside the foveola and 61 inside the umbo.

Conclusions : The proposed automatic method performed accurately for both healthy retinas and retinas affected by AMD. The method can be applied successfully to scans from different vendors, thus providing a reliable reference location for the assessment of structural biomarkers in OCT.